心得 | 论文 | 作文 | 风水 | 谜语 | 菜谱 | 组词 | 诗词 | 成语 | 注音 | 考试 | 日记 | 教学 | 课件 | 汉字 | 词语 | 解梦 | 草药 | 单词 | 格言 | 笑话 | 康熙字典

位置:学习心得体会网 >> 论文范文 >> 教学论文 >> 英语论文

基于语料库的中国英语专业学生英语作文中双宾构式研究(3)

类型:英语论文 时间:2017年11月16日

his construction from theperspective of CG with Goldberg as one of salient representatives. They share thesame point that constructions are the basic units of language, the form-meaning pairswith their unique schematic meanings. Therefore, they fundamentally deny theinterrelation between DCs and dative constructions. Goldberg (1995) thinks that DCconceptualizes the daily events of transferring objects and has its unpredictableconstructional meaning (X Causes Y to Receive Z) and special form(NP+V+NP1+NP2). She focuses on the constructional meaning of this construction,and the interaction between verbs and DCs. Her approach, serving as the theoreticalframef the present study, will be elaborated on in the next chapter.Under the theoretical framef CG, Xu Shenghuan (2001) analyzes EnglishDCs, and other domestic scholars additionally study Chinese DCs and the differenceand similarity existing between Chinese and English DCs. According to XuShenghuan (2001), the ditransitive verbs can be classified into three categories: verbsexpressing inherently sense of giving, such as, give, hand, pay and offer etc.; verbshaving no explicit meaning of giving, but being featured as the fulfillment of theaction and indicated by the verb followed by tects, such as, tell, show, promiseand ask, etc.; verbs having no senses of giving, and with their semantic space notrequiring tects necessarily, but the appearance of one ditransitive object N2implying the existence of the other ditransitive object N1, and thus the entitling themeaning that NIpossessing N2, such as, bake, sing, knit andand so on. AndZhang Bojiang (1999) studies Chinese DCs. Wang Yin (2011) in his two-volumemonograph titled Researches on Construction Grammar: Theoretical Explorationstudies English and Chinese DCs both separately and comparatively. Such scholars asZhang Jianli (2006, 2010, 2011), Cheng Qilong (2004), Shi Yuzhi (2004) and XiongXueliang (2007) compares the differences between English and Chinese DCs.............hapter Three Theoretical Foundation........143.1 Tenets of Goldberg’s Construction Grammar.... 143.1.1 Concept of Construction ......143.1.2 Interaction between Verbs and Constructions ..........13.1.3 Advantages of the Construction Account ........163.2 Ditransitive Construction by Goldberg .... 173.2.1 Conception of Ditransitive Construction.........183.2.2 Classification of Verbs in Ditransitive Construction .........193.2.3 Semantic Constraints on Arguments of Ditransitive Construction......2

相关阅读

更多分类