心得 | 论文 | 作文 | 风水 | 谜语 | 菜谱 | 组词 | 诗词 | 成语 | 注音 | 考试 | 日记 | 教学 | 课件 | 汉字 | 词语 | 解梦 | 草药 | 单词 | 格言 | 笑话 | 康熙字典

位置:学习心得体会网 >> 论文范文 >> 教学论文 >> 英语论文

基于语料库的中国英语专业学生英语作文中双宾构式研究(6)

类型:英语论文 时间:2017年11月16日

2006) advocate the research on this construction from theperspective of CG with Goldberg as one of salient representatives. They share thesame point that constructions are the basic units of language, the form-meaning pairswith their unique schematic meanings. Therefore, they fundamentally deny theinterrelation between DCs and dative constructions. Goldberg (1995) thinks that DCconceptualizes the daily events of transferring objects and has its unpredictableconstructional meaning (X Causes Y to Receive Z) and special form(NP+V+NP1+NP2). She focuses on the constructional meaning of this construction,and the interaction between verbs and DCs. Her approach, serving as the theoreticalframef the present study, will be elaborated on in the next chapter.Under the theoretical framef CG, Xu Shenghuan (2001) analyzes EnglishDCs, and other domestic scholars additionally study Chinese DCs and the differenceand similarity existing between Chinese and English DCs. According to XuShenghuan (2001), the ditransitive verbs can be classified into three categories: verbsexpressing inherently sense of giving, such as, give, hand, pay and offer etc.; verbshaving no explicit meaning of giving, but being featured as the fulfillment of theaction and indicated by the verb followed by tects, such as, tell, show, promiseand ask, etc.; verbs having no senses of giving, and with their semantic space notrequiring tects necessarily, but the appearance of one ditransitive object N2implying the existence of the other ditransitive object N1, and thus the entitling themeaning that NIpossessing N2, such as, bake, sing, knit andand so on. AndZhang Bojiang (1999) studies Chinese DCs. Wang Yin (2011) in his two-volumemonograph titled Researches on Construction Grammar: Theoretical Explorationstudies English and Chartopics and identical expressions influence the reliability of lateral comparisonbetween different corpora, for example, somen verbs as afford, take andrefuse have no concordance lines belonging to DCs. Therefore, further corpus-basedstudies on DCs could adopt a many-to-one or one-to-many method, that is, comparingexperiment corpora to one reference corpus, or making a comparison between oneexperiment corpus and multiple reference corpora.This study gives its analysis of the data results mainly from the perspective ofCG, such as, prototypical effect and cognitive process, thus further studies on DCscould interpret their results in terms of knowledge of SLA or other linguistic theories

相关阅读

更多分类